Електронний каталог ННСГБ НААН online
Electronic catalog
NSAL NAAS online

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

09 FEATURES OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND ORGANIZATIONAL ENSURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE IN THE UKRAINIAN TERRITORY IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE 20TH CENTURY full article
doi.org/10.31073/istnauka202204-09
SHCHEBETIUK Nataliia, KUCHER Volodymyr
Pages: 115-132
Summary

The article is devoted to the consideration of the problem of the formation of scientific support for the development of agriculture in Ukraine in the first quarter of the last century. Applying the principles of historicism, scientific knowledge, objectivity and interdependence of the general, logical and developmental connection, the main factors influencing the functionality of the relationship between agronomists, scientists, peasants and state bodies were revealed. The consequences of positive changes in the agricultural sphere at the beginning of the last century are substantiated, primarily thanks to the active activity of agricultural societies, agronomists, zemstvos and the interest of farmers. It has been proven that the scientific and organizational component was developing, the popularization of new agronomic knowledge, the publication of popular scientific literature, and the strengthening of state support. All together contributed to the creation of an effective mechanism of cooperation of all participants in the process and, most importantly, to an increase in the productivity of agriculture. However, military and revolutionary events and phenomena destroyed not only economic objects, but also the well-established communicative environment of industry specialists and peasants. In difficult conditions, agrarian scientists continued their scientific and organizational activities, and the Bolshevik authorities created an ideological toolkit for their further domination.

Keywords
agronomy, research, agriculture, food crisis, development, scientific support
References
  1. Verhunov, V. A. (2012). Silskohospodarska doslidna sprava v Ukraini. Vid zarodzhennia do akademichnoho isnuvannia: orhanizatsiinyi aspekt [Agricultural research work in Ukraine. From birth to academic existence: organizational aspect]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  2. Padalka, S. S., Kyrylenko, I. H., & Verhunov, V. A. (2019). Ahrarna istoriia Ukrainy [Agrarian history of Ukraine]. U 3-kh ch. Ch. I: Vid naidavnishykh chasiv do pochatku XX stolittia [From ancient times to the beginning of the 20th century]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  3. Shchebetyuk, N. B. (2017). Rozvytok ahrarnoyi nauky Ukrayiny naprykintsi 20-kh – u 30-i rr. XX st. [The development of agricultural science in Ukraine in the late 20's – 30's of the twentieth century]. Kam’yanets'-Podil's'kyy [in Ukrainian].
  4. Hurevych, H. (1919). Postanovka voprosa massovogo selskokhozyaystvennogo obrazovaniya v gody «agronomicheskogo podema». [Statement of the issue of mass agricultural education in the years of «agronomic boom»]. Yuzhno-Russkaia selskokhoziaistvennaia hazeta – South Russian agricultural newspaper, 17 aprelia, p. 8 [in Russian].
  5. Bilotserkivska, A. S. (2010). Silske hospodarstvo Ukrainy pershoi chverti KhKh stolittia ta yoho naukovo-osvitnie zabezpechennia v konteksti diialnosti profesora A. H. Ternychenka [Agriculture of Ukraine in the first quarter of the 20th century and its scientific and educational support in the context of the activities of Professor A. H. Ternichenko]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  6. Kulzhynskyi, S. (1922). Puti k pereotsenke dannykh selskokhozyaystvennykh opytnykh uchrezhdeniy [Ways to re-evaluate the data of agricultural experimental institutions]. Selskokhoziaistvennoe opytnoe delo – Agricultural experimental work, no. 1, pp. 24-38 [in Russian].
  7. Kozhevnykov, Yl. (1919). O sovremennoi zemskoi ahronomyy [About modern zemstvo agronomy]. Yuzhno-Russkaia selskokhoziaistvennaia hazeta – South Russian agricultural newspaper, no. 45-46, pp. 4-18 [in Russian].
  8. Kachynskyi, V. M. (1922). Ocherky ahrarnoi revoliutsyy na Ukrayne [Essays on the agrarian revolution in Ukraine], vol. 1. Kharkov, pp. 3-21 [in Russian].
  9. Hryhorev, P. (1918). Opytnye uchrezhdeniya i agrarnye dekrety [Experienced institutions and agrarian decrees]. Yuzhno-Russkaia selskokhoziaistvennaia hazeta – South Russian agricultural newspaper, no. 9, pp. 3-12 [in Russian].
  10. Vladymyrov, M. K. (1922). Osnovnye momenty selskokhozyaystvennoy politiki [Highlights of agricultural policy]. Kharkov [in Russian].
  11. Lazurenko, V. M., & Paskalenko, V. Ye. (2011). Ukrainskyi fermer v dobu NEPu [A Ukrainian farmer in the days of the NEP]. Cherkasy [in Ukrainian].
  12. (1976). Komunistychna partiia Ukrainy v rezoliutsiiakh i rishenniakh z’izdiv, konferentsii i plenumiv TsK [The Communist Party of Ukraine in resolutions and decisions of congresses, conferences and plenums of the CC]. In 2 volumes. Volume 1. 1918–1941. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  13. Ehorov, M. (1918). Oblastnoe soveshchaniye po opytnomu delu 18 y 19 dekabria 1917 h. [Regional meeting on an experimental case on December 18 and 19, 1917]. Yuzhno-Russkaia selskokhoziaistvennaia hazeta – South Russian agricultural newspaper, no. 2. p. 11 [in Russian].
  14. (1918). Opytnoe delo y zemelnaia reforma [Experimental business and land reform]. Yuzhno-Russkaia selskokhoziaistvennaia hazeta – South Russian agricultural newspaper, no. 21-22, pp. 10-22 [in Russian].
  15. Hurevych, H. (1918). Opytnaia stantsyia y rasprostranenye selskokhoziaistvennykh znanyi [Experimental station and dissemination of agricultural knowledge]. Yuzhno-Russkaia selskokhoziaistvennaia hazeta – South Russian agricultural newspaper, no. 3, pp. 8-12 [in Russian].
powered by web студия